Wednesday, 18 March 2015

Stronk WoWs Multicore

Source: http://world-of-ru.livejournal.com/3788925.html

Hello warriors,

remember how Wargaming said that World of Warships would use multicore support? Well, let's have a look at the CPU core load of the current beta client. After all, multicore CPU's should rock with this new BigWorld iteration, no?



Well.... no. The game basically still uses only two cores, good old BigWorld. Still... it's a good game. Let's see how it turns out.
Posted by at

37 comments:

  1. Unknown18 March 2015 at 13:08

    Wtf. Everyone shouts for multi core support. Wows has it yet you still complain about it???!!! What is wrong with this community?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unknown18 March 2015 at 14:41

      Yeah, "multi" is more than one. People are stupid.

      Delete
    2. Unknown18 March 2015 at 17:36

      I think people just expect multicore support to divide workload equally between cores: 50%, 25% or 12.5% each depending on your core count.

      But that's not how it works. I don't think I've seen any application that does such a thing.

      Delete
    3. mh1ultramarine18 March 2015 at 21:32

      I have half a processor doing nothing. If WoT had quad core support it could use an extra two 1.5GHz core. WoWs plays at 30fps while WoT plays at 12fps

      Delete
    4. Anonymous18 March 2015 at 23:35

      I believe folks are looking for it to be truly multithreaded, instead of two monolithic threads.

      Delete
  2. Unknown18 March 2015 at 13:10

    Technically it has multicore support. It uses more than one core. So WG is right. :P

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nya-chan Production18 March 2015 at 13:10

    "The game basically still uses only two cores"
    "Not multicore"

    Pick one - two cores is also multicore, as dualcore is multicore :)

    Also I am not sure it actually doesn't use more, it can have some small processes on other cores. Has somebody done processes check deeper in? I would be interested in those.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous18 March 2015 at 13:12

    Two cores should be, and is more than enough support for the game. I don't understand why people think they need to utilize more.

    And it is a damn good game :) Still has a few interface updates to go and player support features. Other than that, it's pretty much ready for release. I'm surprised they manage to build the game this fast

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. mh1ultramarine18 March 2015 at 21:34

      This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous18 March 2015 at 23:40

      A truly multithreaded engine would leave folks with older quad- and hex- cores in a better position. They may not have enough grunt to run it on two cores without bottlenecking their graphics card, but their build may work fine for literally everything except WOT.

      Delete
  5. Unknown18 March 2015 at 13:22

    Multicore implies that it uses all cores, otherwise they should just call it dual core support. But I think that two cores are sufficient anyway.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unknown18 March 2015 at 13:35

      If you really want to be cocky about it, dual is already more then one therefore, multiple, and noone said a multi-core program / game MUST use all cores available. Some do, some don't , yet it's still multi-core .. and is waaaay better performing then WoT ever did.

      Delete
  6. Anonymous18 March 2015 at 13:25

    Sorry Rita, but when you already start in your first days of this Blog to constantly flame Wargaming without any real reason, there is no need to follow this Blog anymore. You spread more hate against Wargaming than SS did ... while SS at least had some good arguments! Your posts are simply trying to throw shit at them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous18 March 2015 at 13:30

      And you know what? WoWs actualy uses ALL Cores! I have 20% load on EVERY core when i play WoWs ...

      But i guess simply posting a fake Benchmark and spreading some hate is far easier than to look for yourself ...

      Delete
    2. Unknown18 March 2015 at 14:08

      Hahaha. Your'e working for Wargaming man? The only one that hate here is YOU. You and only you.

      Delete
    3. naughtydog2918 March 2015 at 14:15

      Please plitzkrieg, you are going to have to try a LOT harder than that if you are going to achieve whatever task you have taken on.

      Better yet, go and learn how to say' Do you want fries with that?' Likely to work out better for you, your poor, sad, little individual...

      Delete
    4. Anonymous18 March 2015 at 15:38

      Other than you i am actually an alpha-tester .... i can start up the game and look at the cpu-load ... guess what: all my 4 cores are evenly loaded! please for the love of god ... just try it out for yourself!

      Delete
    5. Anonymous18 March 2015 at 16:00

      I have an apple core if that helps...... no? ok, but it floats my boat.

      Delete
  7. Unknown18 March 2015 at 13:26

    2015. Game that can't use more than two cores, and people in comments here see no problem in this little fact.

    LOL

    OK.

    Better go and build that WG Shrine so you can pray to SerB 5 times a day, or whatever it is you wanna do.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unknown18 March 2015 at 13:32

      Why would you want a CBT game to use 6 cores ? It's still under development, and the 2 cores do the work just fine. It's stable and its doing what it should during a Closed Beta Test ... For the Release version, things will probably change.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous18 March 2015 at 13:32

      Butthurt WarThunder Fanboy. Launch the game for yourself and look how many Cores are actually in use ...

      Delete
    3. Nya-chan Production18 March 2015 at 13:33

      What if it can use more than two cores, but since it doesn't need to (50 - 60% is still nothing on those quad+ cores and the last one is dual-core HT), it doesn't move processes to other cores? It's a possibility, getting the processes spread across all cores evenly might not be the best option.

      Delete
    4. Unknown18 March 2015 at 13:37

      My point exactly, according to the pic shown above, it seems like the main process is being run by one core, while the smaller things get "outsourced" to a second core, thus increasing performance. Which is a good way to make sure the system is stable, yet it gets no performance issues.

      Delete
    5. Unknown18 March 2015 at 14:43

      Do you actually play games? Multi implies more than one and few games utilize all your cores... Get a better CPU.

      Delete
    6. mh1ultramarine18 March 2015 at 21:36

      why should I get a 3GHz dual core when I already have a 1.5GHz quad core. (Ideally I'd have a 3GHz quad core, but hey)

      Delete
  8. Unknown18 March 2015 at 13:43

    Btw, Rita, you forgot to mention something ... yes .. and this is somewhat brings me to lose some faith in your work ...

    http://gamegpu.ru/images/remote/http--www.gamegpu.ru-images-stories-Test_GPU-MMO-World_of_Warships_Beta_-test-ws_amd.jpg

    As anyone can see here , ( this image was just below the one Rita posted ) AMD processors seem to work prettys well with multicoring WoWs ...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unknown18 March 2015 at 13:43

      Oh and the original post btw ..

      http://gamegpu.ru/mmorpg-/-onlayn-igry/world-of-warships-beta-test-gpu.html

      Delete
  9. Unknown18 March 2015 at 13:54

    The game does not really need 3 or 4 or 5 or 6 or 7 or 8 cores to work well.

    Also, 2 core = multi core support.

    It is no Metro Last Light or Survarium, true, but dont knock it too much. It is in CBT. Early CBT.

    ReplyDelete
  10. zMeul18 March 2015 at 13:57

    wote: "The game basically still uses only two cores"

    actually .. no; the BigWorld engine is still single threaded - that spike you see in other core is Windows's own services

    ReplyDelete
  11. Artistas18 March 2015 at 15:32

    Oh i just love when playing wot i drive in the city and my 40 fps turns to 17 fps. BugWorld at its finest.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Unknown18 March 2015 at 15:36

    Hyper-threading ftw....

    ReplyDelete
  13. arrgh18 March 2015 at 18:10

    It is a fact that bugworld cant take advantage of a powerfull cpu and graphicscard. There is a reason not any well known game uses this engine. and again, there is single, dual quad and multicore out there. If WoWs supports two cores it is fine in a time when 4-8 cores are standard. WoT is from a time when 4-6 cores had been standard. Hooray

    ReplyDelete
  14. Unknown18 March 2015 at 18:34

    Well... somewhat underwhelming but at least it's better than monocore.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Unknown18 March 2015 at 19:31

    no multicore? can someone explain the 1st, 3rd and 5th core then?

    http://www.pohrani.com/f/3X/iC/1PYtcPvY/wows-usage.jpg

    anycase.. fx6300 with r9 280x, maxxed out settings result in rock solid 75fps, no drops..

    ReplyDelete
  16. Unknown19 March 2015 at 12:49

    Multi = 2 is more than 1 .... :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unknown19 March 2015 at 12:50

      Ps. Wg math... Remember the Berlin Trio ? 4 tanks

      Delete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)