Sunday, 8 March 2015

Wargaming in the positive.

According to SuperData analyst firm research, World of Tanks has earned over $ 500 million (31.1 billion rubles) in 2014 (43million more than 2013) and has become the third largest Internet company after CIS "Yandex and Mail.ru.
And as for 2015 they are predicting earnings of 590 million. Wargaming declines to comment on there figures.



Wargaming shares trades on the "Cyprus Stock Exchange" (CSE) since November 2011 but got delisted on 13 January due to a delay of financial results publication.
The latest official data revealed that during the first half of 2013 the company made 234 million and not by surprise the main income comes from World of Tanks.

In 2014 the largest Internet company "Yandex" and Mail.RU groups made 50.8 and 35.77 billion rubles respectively, Wargaming with revenues of 31.1 billion rubles can be considerate as the third largest Internet company (if we exclude the rating participants who are engaged in online trading).
Also Wargaming currently owns 20.3% stake in "Bank of Cyprus Hellenic".

Russia's entire gaming market also grew by 13.3% (1.14 billion) in 2014 according to Newzoo, another data research company.

So yeah boys, if you wanna make the "dough" become a Heisenberg of gaming.


Source: http://top.rbc.ru/technology_and_media/03/03/2015/54f59b2d9a79471774a81450

24 comments:

  1. 500million and they cant get havok to work

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cause slapping money at something automaticly makes shit work, amirite?

      Delete
    2. Yeah, just look at watchdogs, that worked out fine amirite?

      Delete
    3. HAVOK has been completed but it will NEVER be implemented because it is memory/graphics intensive and to many players in Russia have crap computers that can't handle it, but it has nothing to do with a lack of spending by WG.

      Delete
  2. Knowing this they will never get rid of the annoying paying bots. I'm cancelling my account when Armored Warfare goes life.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They atually do get rid of bots, bots barely pay money and after they showed banning over 15K bots worldwide that actaully worked better then keeping crappy bots, since bots really ruin the game for both paying and non-paying users

      Delete
    2. You know nothing, John Data.

      Delete
    3. I like BOT's, free damage to farm. If U are quitting WOT's for AW you must suck at WOT's because you are going from the BIG leagues to the MINOR leagues just like WT (tanks). AW will be will be lucky to make more money than world of warships let alone WOT's. Guess what, you will suck at AW just like you suck at WOT's!!!!!, LOL. I have no desire to even try WT or AW since WOT's is the best and will ALWAYS be the best.

      Delete
    4. nice fanboy commentary there...let`s just wait until AW has hit the dirt...graphics-wise I`d say it already smoked WoT big time...

      Delete
    5. good idea John as none else from WoT will think of starting an AW account......right ? AW looks like a WoT clone with out the Serb nerfs and better MM. so yes it will be a better game over all.
      Mark I have some good news for you buddy, with so many players heading to AW you will get even more bots to play with. but please remember that the bots wont only be on the enemy team. im sure unicums like you wont have a problem having 10 bots on your team against a team of live players lol. but look on the Brightside, at least you wont get reported for raging in chat by bots (don't even attempt to say you don't rage in chat after what you wrote in your post here).

      Delete
  3. You would think, though, that having that big of a revenue would allow them to, I don't know, hire more programmers or historical researchers or whatever they need, so they can implement new things into WoT faster... Like Havok, HD models, optimization, etc. True, throwing money at a problem doesn't necessarily fix it, but more money means more workers, which SHOULD mean faster work. And faster is something WarGaming needs to work on.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You would think, though, that having that big of a revenue would allow them to, I don't know, hire more programmers or historical researchers or whatever they need, so they can implement new things into WoT faster... Like Havok, HD models, optimization, etc. True, throwing money at a problem doesn't necessarily fix it, but more money means more workers, which SHOULD mean faster work. And faster is something WarGaming needs to work on.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. HAVOK has been completed but it will NEVER be implemented because it is memory/graphics intensive and to many players in Russia have crap computers that can't handle it, but it has nothing to do with a lack of spending by WG.

      Delete
    2. how about a freakin` simple ON/OFF switch somewhere on the box that reads "havoc"? can`t be that hard...it is just that WG is full of shit and totally uncoordinated...(Paris anyone?)

      Delete
  5. So much money...

    Such bad programmers.
    Seriously, hire Vostok/4A Games/ GSC for a year to fix your game FFS :P

    ReplyDelete
  6. The problem is not developing team but the computer tech level prevailing in Russia.
    Basically those are very very low end computer hardly worth the name.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He is exactly right. You have to remember, Russia is basically a THIRD WORLD country. The internet in Russia and the computers are crap and WG is doing the best they can to have a very good looking game that can still play on bad computers. All this talk of AW, but from the replays I have seen it looks worse than WG and WT is certainly worse. When I watch a replay of WT, tanks, I can't even make out the tanks they are shooting at the graphics are so bad.

      Delete
    2. so, why the f should I give said f whether or not the rigs in russia might handle things or not, I do not live there yet I get graphics that where considered outdated years ago...again, this all can be set to ones preferences for ones custom rig...so I do not see any excuse in "outdated russian rigs"...that`s blatant BS right out of the farside of WG

      Delete
  7. Silent Stalker (SS) was such a bias IDIOT against WG and WOT's. He said WG/WOT's had peaked, yeah right, new highs in revenue in 2014, 2015 and in 2016 and beyond. WOT's certainly has NOT peaked and WG has World of Warships coming which will be a HUGE success. I predict Armored Warfare will not even challenge the revenue generated by WOWS let along WOT's. From what I have seen of AW, I will treat it similarly to WT (tanks) as the minor leagues and something people play because they aren't good at WOT's.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. contrary to your fanboy whining...check out Ebay...lot`s of mediocre to good to WTF accounts for sale, this has been going for some time now...so where are all those players going to then? Tetris?

      Delete
    2. sorry to burst your bubble but why are all the top WoT Twitch streamers and YouTube uploaders all enjoying AW's test weekends and rating the game highly ? as for the revenue of WoT growing over the last few years, that's because they didn't have any real competition. if things worked and carry on working on past successes Europe would still be run by the Romans. nothing lasts for ever and you need to start excepting that fact.

      Delete
  8. Too many shitty computers in Europe and America so WG cannot implement Havok, its all the fault of 'Muripigs and Banderapigs!

    ReplyDelete