Saturday 28 March 2015

FPS increase in 9.7

Earlier, there were concerns about the FPS drop in 9.7 - especially the first test has shown certain drops on some configurations. Famous Russian video maker Jove however returned to the issue in test 3 and made a video on his PC, where he tested both patches on the same replay.

His system is: I7 2600k, 16GB RAM, Nvidia GTX 970 - practically all settings to maximum apart from sniper mode effects and vegetation in sniper mode. The map was quite difficult: Stalingrad.

His results are:

Minimum FPS in 9.6 - 43, in 9.7 - 57
Maximum FPS in 9.6 - 121, in 9.7 - 121
Average FPS in 9.6 - 82, in 9.7 - 89

According to the feedback of the testers, the worse your PC is, the more noticeable the FPS increase is with the owners of very poor PC's noticing a lot better FPS.


Source:
Posted by at

21 comments:

  1. Unknown28 March 2015 at 14:40

    Good, just damn good :D

    ReplyDelete
  2. Unknown28 March 2015 at 14:48

    The performance problems for me are consistency. When a lot of tanks are on the screen or there's a lot of shooting my fps can drop to 10-15 but under normal conditions it hovers around 40. I hope 9.7 can fix this for me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unknown28 March 2015 at 15:08

      10 - 15? wow i would't play this game with those rates. I usually have about 45 and in worst cases it drops to 25 - 30. I have notebook with i5, 4gb ram ddr3 and radeon 8750M which is crap. Of course i play without shadows and low lighting but with maximum model and texture details..

      Delete
    2. Unknown28 March 2015 at 15:32

      The 10-15 drops are only for short periods of time like after the start of battle countdown so it's manageable.Even so I'd rather have my fps over 30 at all times.

      Delete
    3. Mark Au28 March 2015 at 17:59

      As someone who plays around 10-15 avg fps, I am quite good(or lucky) to get about 50% winrate. Although that that doesn't mean I wouldn't love some extra fps in my games. =)
      (The main reason for the fps is my Intel GMA X4500 integrated)

      Delete
  3. Unknown28 March 2015 at 15:06

    yes ,the first problem of the game is when a massive tanks gets spotted in the same place ,the second is when 20 tanks exchange shots like the hill on mines and the fps loss is massive

    ReplyDelete
  4. Unknown28 March 2015 at 15:09

    It is and constant up and down...
    Nobody comes ou better than before.
    Game requierments slowly Reise...face it.

    Sub 15 fps is teamkilling

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Miracle Man28 March 2015 at 15:40

      I have always played with average 15fps and have 1600WN8 and 54%WR. While I'll be the first to admit, that it's not always enjoyable playing like this, it certainly isn't counterproductive for the team.

      Delete
    2. Unknown30 March 2015 at 01:08

      I bet.

      Delete
  5. Anonymous28 March 2015 at 15:36

    Performance in WOT is very inconsitent because game is single thread coded as well as quite outdated. Sure a better system will benefit you, but you will still be heavily cpu limited specialy turning up those graphic settings because your cpu is not fast enough to feed data to your gpu. And lately intel and amd have focused on more cores and threads for their cpus rather than higher IPC, even though intel still are the fastest but not fast enough for lightly threaded cpu intensive games like WOT and many other mmos.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Infernal28 March 2015 at 16:17

    Mmmm... yes, more performance for wooden computers. I bet they spend thousands on this game, that's why they are still playing on calculators.
    Keep this up WG and soon everyone will forget about your money cow and play actually well designed, coded and optimized games.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous28 March 2015 at 16:47

    More performance for all computers. Everybody benefits from better optimization.

    And no, those who usually play on bad PC dont pay for the game. EU and US pays most for the game and we in west are the ones who make others play for free because we pay more per capita.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Golub28 March 2015 at 16:49

    Yay, my potato laptop will be pleased :)

    ReplyDelete
  9. Adinias28 March 2015 at 16:53

    Maybe a bit offtopic, but a friend of mine played War Thunder and got more than 9000 fps...

    I would guess it's a bug in the FPS counter, but I'm not sure as the game has a very light engine. Something Wargaming can take as an example. Not the fact that it is a aircraft simulator engine, but the fact that the engine is so light. My problem with War Thunder is the one shots. I hate the realism (except the graphics), but I absolutely love looking around in the game.

    I have a good gaming PC, but a laptop that sucks at gaming (an i5 and a GT710m) which I bought for my ICT-studies. Well, it can't even play WoT on improved graphics, but when I put everything in as high as possible when having standard graphics, my performance is very good. The FPS are similar to my Gaming PC then (60-90 FPS).

    Back to the 9000 FPS of my friend, if anyone knows if it is possible, here are his PC-specs:

    Intel i7 5820k (watercooled)
    8 GB of RAM
    MSI X99 Motherboard
    EVGA GeForce GTX 980 ACX 2.0 Superclocked
    128 GB SSD
    2 TB HDD

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unknown29 March 2015 at 12:36

      You can only see 60/144 fps though so 900p is useless anyway.

      Delete
  10. Bugii28 March 2015 at 17:53

    What resolution ?
    43 fps is awful for a GTX 970 and this little soviet kid should have his PC checked for malware.

    Ive never ever seen a single drop below 60fps with V-sync, all maxed out at 1080p. My card is GTX 970M - yes notebook version, which is supposed to be about 80% performance of the desktop chip.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Unknown28 March 2015 at 18:59

    Is it just me or dose every patch WG has come out with recently has "fps increase". I haven't noticed anything. But then again I'm not playing on a toaster like 80% of the RU cluster

    ReplyDelete
  12. Unknown28 March 2015 at 18:59

    Is it just me or dose every patch WG has come out with recently has "fps increase". I haven't noticed anything. But then again I'm not playing on a toaster like 80% of the RU cluster

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous28 March 2015 at 19:46

    Finally! 15fps is not bad but 20fps will be definitely welcomed!

    ReplyDelete
  14. zMeul28 March 2015 at 23:29

    what he doesn't say if he uses the same driver set in both test

    ReplyDelete
  15. Unknown29 March 2015 at 03:33

    that's BS! we all know that the patch doesn't have the same performance as the live version.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)